Pathetic Fallacy
Pathetic Fallacy
Introduction
The term pathetic fallacy was first used by the English critic John Ruskin in 1856 in his book Modern Painters. It refers to a literary device in which human feelings, emotions, or qualities are given to objects of nature or other inanimate things. The word “pathetic” here means emotional, not pitiful, and “fallacy” means false appearance. According to Ruskin, such descriptions happen when poets are deeply moved and project their emotions onto nature.
Ruskin’s View
Ruskin originally used the term in a critical and negative sense. He believed that art should represent truth. For him, attributing human emotions to objects of nature was “false” or “morbid” because it showed not reality but the influence of the poet’s feelings. He gave examples such as describing the crocus flower as “naked and shivering” or a single red leaf as “dancing.” While these are beautiful images, Ruskin argued they do not represent nature as it truly is.
Use in Poetry
Despite Ruskin’s criticism, the pathetic fallacy has been widely used in poetry. Romantic poets, especially Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Shelley, often employed it to express their deep connection between human emotions and the natural world. For example, a stormy sea may be described as “angry,” or flowers may be called “joyful.” This allows nature to reflect human moods and makes descriptions more vivid and emotional.
Difference from Personification
Pathetic fallacy is closely related to personification but is less direct. In personification, an inanimate object is deliberately given human qualities, often in a formal way. In pathetic fallacy, the process is more natural and emotional, arising from the writer’s feelings. It is a spontaneous projection of the poet’s inner state onto the outer world.
Validity and Importance
Ruskin admitted that in the hands of great poets, pathetic fallacy can be valid. When emotions are powerful, it is natural for a poet to humanize nature. For readers, it creates a strong connection between mood and setting. It is especially effective in moments of grief, joy, or awe, where nature seems to echo human experience. Over time, the term has lost its negative tone and is now used neutrally to describe this common poetic device.
Conclusion
The pathetic fallacy is an important element in literature, particularly in poetry. It shows how human emotions influence our perception of nature. While John Ruskin first criticized it as false, later critics and readers have accepted it as a natural and expressive technique. From Shakespeare to the Romantics and beyond, writers have used it to make the external world reflect the inner world of human feelings.
Comments
Post a Comment